Monday, 21 January 2008

My family in Gaza



I was in daily contact with my family all over the past weeks trying to get some news about their situation under the siege, some comfort for my worries and some answers for my questions. My mother, who always tries to hide their news of mounting suffering so that I don’t get too much worried, broke into tears saying that cooking gas has ended, there is no electricity and there is a severe shortage in water. There is nothing in Gaza but cold, darkness, anger, hunger and misery. Our life becomes impossible. When and where does this crisis end my beloved daughter? My sister, Samia, who came to visit the family from Gaza snatched the handset from my mum and started to cheer me up saying we have lived this all our life so don’t worry; carry on the celebration for your graduation and don’t forget to have pictures. Your success is our success. We wished to be with you but you know our wishes remain wishes as usual. Take care of yourself and the family and good bye.

The call has ended. There is nothing before my eyes but my mother’s tears and my sister’s shacking voice. There was bitterness in my mouth and silence for seconds. How can I celebrate my success of having my degree while my family is living the worst barbaric siege in modern history?

Yet, I smiled to my friends in London as I didn’t want to spoil the celebration’s spirit and said: my family is fine, they send you their regards but they have shortage in gas for cooking.

Saturday, 19 January 2008

My Graduation Day


It is Saturday, January 19 2008: my graduation day from the University of Exeter in the UK as a doctor of philosophy in political science. It is a day that I have waited for, for so long, almost five years. Only few months ago, my heart used to dance when I used to think of that day while putting the last touch on my final chapters. Yet today things are completely different of what I’ve expected.


I have mixed feelings. I suppose to be happy, very happy in deed yet I don’t feel the happiness. I want to smile but I have a wound in my heart. My body is here but my mind is in Gaza with my people. How can I celebrate and my family and community do live the harshness of the siege imposed since almost two years. Moreover, such closure and siege have been fully tightened two days ago, namely on Thursday January 17, by the orders of the Israeli occupation defense minister Ehud Barak.


Everyone I talked with in Gaza during the past few days ago is reporting that situation is very serious and getting worse by time. There is no fuel and there is a shortage of food aid and supplies. Large parts of the Gaza Strip had no power, no lights and no heating. Bakeries are closed and hospitals began to rely on generators. Simply put, Gaza occupied civilian population live a collective punishment that paralyzes every aspect of life. The same reports concerning Gaza situation has been released by UNRWA, Red Cross, the European Commissioner for external relations and many other world and local humanitarian organizations. The urgent question is when those in charge of causing such desperate humanitarian crisis would have time to look at these reports and take an action? And till when would Gaza people ad children endure such increasingly misery?


I have to stop here and head towards the university to attend my graduation ceremony. My daughter, Ghaida is putting my gown and hood on and laughing and my husband, Nasser is taking pictures for her. She looks cool. She makes me smile.

My Daughter, Ghaida on my Graduation Day


Wednesday, 16 January 2008

Will peace cost me my home?


Sixty years ago, my grandparents lived in the beautiful village of Beit Daras , a few kilometers north of Gaza . They were farmers and owned hundreds of acres of land.
But in 1948, in the first Arab-Israeli war, many people lost their lives defending our village from the Zionist militias. In the end, with their crops and homes burning, the villagers fled. My family eventually made its way to what became the refugee camp of Khan Yunis in Gaza . We were hit hard by poverty, humiliation and disease. We became refugees, queuing for tents, food and assistance, while the state of Israel was established on the ruins of my family's property and on the ruins of hundreds of other Palestinian villages.
Some people may tire of hearing such stories from the past. "Don't cry over spilled milk" is one of the first sayings I learned in English. But for me, the line between past and present is not so easily broken. I raise this story today because it remains profoundly relevant to the Middle East peace process -- and to help convey the deep-seated fears of Palestinian refugees that we will be asked to exonerate Israel for its actions and to relinquish our right to return home.
That cannot be allowed to happen. All refugees have the right to return. This is an individual right, long recognized in international law, that cannot be negotiated away. Palestinian refugees -- and there are more than 4 million of us registered with the United Nations today -- hold this right no less than Kosovar or Rwandan or any other refugees.
Of course, I understand that the clock cannot be turned back. Most of the Palestinian villages inside what is now Israel no longer exist. And experience shows that when the rights of refugees are recognized and backed by international communities, only a small portion opt to return.
But the option should be open to us. If a refugee decides to return, he or she should not be hindered. Anything less would be unacceptable to Palestinians, two-thirds of whom are refugees. Those who choose not to return must be fairly compensated for their losses.
My fear is that in the months ahead, enormous financial and political pressure may be brought against our fractured leadership to concede the rights of refugees. In 2000, Yasser Arafat was castigated internationally for his refusal to accept what was perversely termed a "generous offer" from then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, even though it made no provision whatsoever for the return of refugees. However, Arafat was greeted as a hero by Palestinians for his principled unwillingness to sanctify ethnic cleansing.
Seven years later, we will perhaps be confronted with another "generous offer" aiming to formalize our dispossession. Tragically, world powers have little stomach to battle Israel for what they view as bygone peccadilloes. There are real consequences for being stateless and weak. For two years, I have been unable to return to my home in Gaza . In 2006, I was stranded in the Sinai with my two small children, unable to get through the closed border from Egypt into Gaza . It is perhaps madness to want to enter such a prison, but it is where my family and loved ones live. I eventually gave up. Last summer, I tried and failed again.
Yet my ultimate destination is not Khan Yunis but Beit Daras. It is fundamentally unjust -- even all these years later -- that the world stands by and countenances the Israeli decision to expropriate my family's land.And it is fundamentally racist to believe that I would pose a threat to Israel if I were to move back to my family's village (which I would do if I were given the option). The notion of a Jewish state that must always retain a Jewish character -- so that people of other ethnicities can be barred from living in their ancestral homes and minorities groups are treated as second-class citizens -- is frighteningly similar to the apartheid state of South Africa , where different ethnic groups were treated unequally under law.
If black and white South Africans could resolve their differences on the basis of equality, why is it inappropriate to insist that Israelis and Palestinians do the same? Surely all modern conceptions of justice and equality must decry a system that places Jews above Palestinians.
Both peoples have suffered enormously over the last several decades. Resolution, however, will not come by the powerful dictating to the weak, but only through insistence on equality between the two peoples.

Sunday, 10 June 2007

The Worst is Coming

What is happening now in Gaza is a terrible madness. There is no doubt about this fact. However, a central question is must be raised at this juncture: why is this madness taking place? Engaging adequately and honestly with this question requires first seeking answers to other several questions: Where did this chain of events originate? Shouldn't one begin with the cruel joke of Israel's withdrawal from Gaza in September 2005, praised by the world as a brave beginning while in point of fact it imprisoned Gaza and severed it from the whole world, including the Palestinian West Bank? Shouldn't one start with the throttling siege and financial boycott imposed by the west upon the Palestinian people, depriving doctors, teachers, engineers and all civil society sectors of their right to livelihood after Hamas won the 2006 elections? Shouldn't one commence with the security apparatus controlled by Fatah and its resistance to transferring power to the government elected democratically in January last year?

I am an ordinary Palestinian who is tired of raising questions and seeking answers। In 1993 I spent a year in Israel studying Hebrew getting to know the Israeli people. In 2002, I came to the University of Exeter to study Middle Eastern politics and learn about possible ways forward towards ending our own plight and that of the Israelis. Yet the more I come to know, the more distressed and depressed I become. And the more I come to know the fewer answers I am able to provide even to questions coming from young children, including my own.

For many Palestinians who live the horror of the bloody factional fight both in Gaza and the West Bank, answers to the series of questions raised above are pretty straightforward। Yet, they also know that their answers, as well as their suffering and daily causalities, totaling over 1500 over the past year alone, at the hands of Israel and now at the hands of Palestinians, are of little importance in the eyes of the world. After all who cares about Gaza, the most densely populated area in the world? Who even wants Gaza? Years ago, it was the former Israeli PM Itzhak Rabin who dreamt that Gaza would simply drown in the Mediterranean. Today, Gaza is drowning in blood but also in starvation, in isolation, in a lack of resources and mechanisms to enforce the law, in the disorder and chaos of what the world has described as a power struggle or, more recently, a civil war.

It is an incontestable fact that Hamas and Fatah are currently committing a fatal mistake whose disastrous consequences are impacting the social and political fabric of Palestinian society and bringing severe damage upon the Palestinian cause in general। Wasn’t it Hamas that promised people to bring about change, reform and order after its sweeping victory in the last elections? Wasn’t it Fatah that made a commitment to internal change and reform in the wake of those elections? Wasn’t it the west that called for democratic Palestinian elections that would put an end to corruption in the Palestinian Authority and allow people a free and fair chance to determine their fates? The current situation in Gaza and the West Bank bears no relation whatsoever to these promises and ideals or to the aspirations of the Palestinian people. Neither change nor reform has occurred nor were the voice and choice of the people respected by the world. However, depicting the current bloodletting by the largest political factions in Gaza and the West Bank as purely internal, factional conflict is gravely misleading at best. It is no secret that he first episodes of the mess currently taking place in Gaza were generated, funded and supported from outside of the Gaza Strip. What right did the US have, for instance, to arm, train and fund one faction at the expense of others, towards undermining the legitimate government? What right did Israel have to allow weapons into Gaza while concurrently holding up humanitarian aid? And finally, what right did both Israel and the west have to imprison an entire nation including its democratically elected officials, in response to elections results which they didn’t like?

Addressing these questions is a necessary part of the solution to the bloodshed ongoing in Gaza। The sooner this happens, the more likely it is that this mess may be contained. Palestinian leaders, both Hamas and Fatah, as well as what remains of what so-called Palestinian civil society, have their own formidable share to contribute towards a solution. A shared vision of national priorities urgently needs to take precedence over divisive factional priorities. A government backed by the west alone stands no chance of functioning adequately. A government lacking legitimacy and broad-based popular support stands no chance of surviving. Only a Palestinian government combining both these vital elements will be able to endure and govern. But only today, a senior Israeli official exhorted “an emergency government without the participation of Hamas, [to which] the funds can flow". Such blindness renders prospects for an end to this chaos more bleak than ever. When will Israel at long last realize that the Palestinian problem cannot be transposed onto a strictly humanitarian crisis to be easily solved with funds? When will it recognize Palestinians as a people with inalienable rights, human dignity and aspirations? It is no coincidence that these sides of the issue have been consistently neglected.

Many experts consider the situation in Palestine as, first and foremost, a case of failed diplomacy. Today, it is also, no less, a case of failed internal Palestinian politics. The current juxtaposition of these two failures means, I fear, that the worst is coming.

Saturday, 21 October 2006

Partnering for Peace in the Middle East, Part II

(Panelists of JWS12, Ghada Ageel, Shireen Khamis, and Rela Mazali.)

Part II: Meet Three of your Partners
By Reza Corinne Clifton
PROVIDENCE, RI - I met three incredible women recently: Ghada Ageel, a Muslim Palestinian who was born as a refugee whose current home is in Gaza; Rela Mazali, a Jewish Israeli who was born in 1948, the year the state of Israel was founded; and Shireen Khamis, a Christian Palestinian whose home and family near Bethlehem have been disrupted by a twenty-five foot wall that surrounds her town and segregates it from centuries old neighboring towns.
Ageel, Mazali, and Khamis are the featured speakers of the twelfth “Jerusalem Women Speak: Three Women, Three Faiths, One Shared Vision.” JWS is a national speaking tour organized by Partners for Peace, a Washington D.C.-based, United Nations-registered nongovernmental organization (NGO) with a 501(c)(3) tax status. Partners for Peace was founded in 1998 “to educate the American public about key issues in the effort to secure peace and justice among Palestinians and Israelis.”

A three week-long speaking tour, Partners for Peace Program Coordinator Jacob Pace also arranged a number of media stops along the way, all in the hopes of getting the message out; a message which conveys the difficulty of maintaining hope in a region that has been riddled with military conflict for the past half-century. The stories of Ageel, Mazali, and Khamis are as powerfully stirring as they are shockingly foreign to American ears. Here, in Partnering for Peace in the Middle East, Part II, I have provided a fragment of what each woman had to say, about her home; her everyday life; and her struggle to keep faith that the world will eventually intervene in a just and peace-seeking way.

Ghada Ageel, a Muslim Palestinian, age 35Ghada Ageel’s story “starts in 1948,” she will tell you, when her grandmother’s family was expelled from their home in Beit Daras; it was part of Palestine, but it became part of Israel. Like her parents, Ageel was born in a refugee camp—Khan Younis—in the southern Gaza Strip. Explains Ageel in her own words:
“The refugee-hood was passed through my grandmother, to my father, and my father passed it to me; and now I pass it on to the fourth generation—to my kids.

Usually you get punished because you did something. I was punished before I was born.”
Ageel’s childhood was full of reminders of her status, as a refugee with restrictions placed on her by Israel. “What is refugee camp? It’s a place with misery and poverty and nothing but despair. We’re very close to the beaches and the Mediterranean; it’s very beautiful. I was deprived of enjoying [it] because of these…Israeli illegal settlers who followed us in 1967.”
Ageel and her father shared aspirations of her becoming a doctor, but these were interrupted by the consequences of what is known as the first Intifada or Palestinian uprising. “I’m in high school. I’m waiting for University. Before reaching University…in 1987, 1988, the universities are declared closed by Israel.”

Nevertheless, Ageel was not deterred from individually working for peace. Upon the reopening of universities, she began studying the Hebrew language in Israel, to correspond with the peace process that emerged in the early 1990’s referred to as the Oslo Accords. Ageel explains:
“I go to Israel to study Hebrew language because it’s the peace process—a new era. We have to learn the language of dialogue because [19]48-94,” she approximates, is “around 50 years.”
But the process ultimately fell apart, and contrary to earlier peace accords and United Nations policy, Jewish settlers continued to move into areas denoted as Palestinian territories while the Israeli army continued militarizing Palestinian borders.

As a matter of fact, the borders of Gaza—Ageel’s current home—were so restricted by the Israeli military as of August, that trying to return back home after doing scholarly work in England for her Doctorate in Middle East Politics from the United Kingdom’s University of Exeter, she was denied from entering. “Lucky for Partners for Peace” she says ironically, for with the borders closed, she probably would not have been able to leave for the tour had she been in Gaza instead of England.

Ageel shared other information about how the current infrastructure supports—or really obstructs—the work of peace in Gaza:
“Ten years ago, there [were] demonstrations for peace; activism with Israelis; inviting Israeli delegations; [and] going to Israeli Universities. Now, because politics [have] put [up] these barriers, Rela cannot go to Gaza; I cannot go to Israel…There is no environment even to conduct these kinds of activities—peace activities that could bring people together or make the distance a little bit closer.”

It is information delivered like this, that considers and presents the implications of policy on civilians and families, that makes the Partners for Peace program, and the participation of Ageel and other women so important. “I speak up on behalf of ordinary Palestinians. Usually, the guns are speaking and the media is speaking and a foreigner or correspondent is covering my story or a politician is covering my story. Rarely there is opportunity for ordinary people to talk.”

Ghada makes it clear, though, that like a falling currency, the significance of her here in the US talking to American citizens and to the media may be losing its value with the people there where she lives.
“…for the people in my refugee camp…they view it with hope, though it’s very small hope. Other people and groups…joke about the tour or laugh about it because they’ve lost hope of USAid and their policies and the International Community, United Nations, International Law, Human Rights. “I could face this group if this tour had been before July 2006, but after the [Israel-] Lebanon War…”

Besides a student pursuing her doctorate, Ageel works as an academic counselor for a US Agency for International Development (USAID) organization called The Academy for Educational Development.

Rela Mazali, a Jewish Israeli, age 58Rela Mazali was born in 1948, “into the dream,” she explains, referring to the successful political movement that saw Jews “return” to their historic land. “My mom came from the U.S. She was an activist; was a Zionist-socialist activist, and she chose to leave Kansas City to go to Palestine and do what she thought was establishing a just, egalitarian national homeland.”

All of the women reveal information that is new; they also fearlessly broach topics that might be referred euphemistically as elephants in the room. Early in our conversation, in talking about her mother’s journey, Mazali reveals one:

“Going there, she thought like many of the people who chose to go there from the West, that it was more or less empty; more or less unsettled.” Mazali compares the magnitude of this assumption to the magnitude of assumptions that influenced the American doctrine, Manifest Destiny. She continues with what she calls “another familiar” or similar “narrative” to the American one, saying “And there was also a belief that the Westerners were going there among other things in order to bring process.”

Mazali herself now works with young people in Israel involved in varying degrees of draft resistance, a population Mazali indicates is “really substantial in Jewish-Israeli society.” For her, working with these youth is a great part of why she is still able to maintain “a real sense of energy and hope.” Underexposed, she insists, is “Intentional draft avoidance of the kind that was practiced here on a broader scale in [the war with] Vietnam.”

Her path toward working for anti-militarization and peace was not a direct one. “For many years, I was unable to see what was right before my eyes,” she explains, referring in part to her own military service in a non-combat unit in 1967.

At her post, she was exposed to communications sent from the Israeli military to UN forces that were monitoring the Israeli-Syrian border. “I knew very well that this story [that Israel was reporting] about tractors going out to plow the field and Syrians shelling them just because they were plowing their fields peacefully was not the real story, because the tractors went out to specific parts of what was called ‘No Man’s Land,’ in order to establish presence there—and it was disputed territory.”

Mazali was not yet moved, though. She explains: “So I realized that the narrative we were getting wasn’t what was happening but I still accepted that this was necessary probably; that somebody knew that they were doing.”

Like Ageel—and Khamis—Mazali is now much more critical of and concerned with the broadcasted narratives. She explained one area of her concern at a presentation at RI College, in response to an audience member’s censure of Ageel for using a map that does show changes to the area following the recent departure of Jewish settlers:
“I think that there is a lot of misperception around that, because it’s true that the illegal settlements have been evacuated. There were 7000 settlers in all of Gaza that were evacuated. But Israel controls the whole periphery.”

Mazali is able to cite more information, too. “The military, the Israeli military is all around the Gaza Strip, and pretty often…inside the strip. Incursions into the strip both with helicopters and tanks and foot soldiers and planes happen all the time.”

Referencing the same segregation that Ageel noted, Mazali continues revealing a deeper narrative: “Nobody can get into Gaza or go out of Gaza without Israeli permission. Nobody is registered in the census in Gaza. All of the control of information of who belongs in Gaza and who doesn’t belong in Gaza; who is allowed in and who isn’t is in the hands of the Israelis. It has not been passed to the Palestinians.”

Mazali has noticed a general misperception if not “bias” at how reports are disseminated about Jewish Settlers and Palestinian land. “There has been an enormous amount of building in the settlements in the West Bank. We are talking about the Palestinians living on twenty-percent of the land of historical Palestine, and on that land there is accelerated illegal settlement…and the wall which does not follow the border, but goes inside the West Bank, snaking back and forth in order to protect settlements by and large.”

She is also very preoccupied with the penetration of violence and militarization into every sector of Israeli society. Her organization, New Profile, has documented the use of imagery of young soldiers in conflict for all kinds of marketing—political slogans, beer advertisements, and boxer shorts commercials to name just a few. She also sees the exaltation of the military and war as factors that skew how Israeli society promotes the teaching of the Holocaust. In response to an audience member who criticizes the panelists for not mentioning the Holocaust, this is what Mazali had to say:

“I feel that it is very painful to me to see how in Israel the Holocaust is exploited; literally exploited in order to instill in generation after generation of young people a sense that if we do not use military force, we will be annihilated.

“The children that study the Holocaust in high school are often very directly connected to their very immediate inscription [into the army],” and, she goes on to say, “The Holocaust in many Israeli schools is taught as a national catastrophe, which it is, but not as a universal catastrophe which needs to be averted in any place that it may take place by means which do not include military action.”

Mazali is concerned that “turning the use of the military into the only answer to it”—the Holocaust—cheapens it; moreover, she is afraid that Israeli society and people are suffering by this militaristic sense of priority. She cites twenty-five percent as the number of people in Israel under the poverty line, and one-third as that number of children. She has a firm belief in the connection between the ongoing conflict and Israel’s—and America’s—roles in the aggressions:
“By resisting peace and investing increasing amounts of money—both Israeli and American money—in armament and war and reconstruction after self-destruction, [Israel] is widening the gaps between rich and poor really fast and really dangerously.”

Shireen Khamis (Age 23), a Christian PalestinianLike the other two panelists, Shireen Khamis is very concerned with the question of accuracy and depth in reporting about Israel/Palestine, and how these form the perceptions of the international community. As a matter of fact, one of the first comments she made upon starting her presentation at RIC was “We are the reality and nothing but the reality in Palestine. And if we are not credible enough, go and check the alternative media. Not the American media, but the alternative media…”

For Khamis, reality has been shaped by living in Beit Jala, a town close to one of the holiest areas in the world—“five minutes from Bethlehem,” she describes, and “ten minutes from Jerusalem.” Despite the sanctity of the place, according to Khamis, “This lovely city is nothing but a prison [now] where the population, the citizens, the Palestininian citizens—Christians and Muslims—live on thirteen percent of the original land because eighty-seven percent of the area of Bethlehem was confiscated.”

Despite the frustrations of Khamis and her neighbors and the objections of some members of the International Community, Israel does not seem to be done pursuing land. Khamis explains:
“…[A]lthough 87 percent was confiscated, the Israeli government just wanted more land! It confiscated the Northern part of Bethlehem because…it’s a religious place for Jews. So they made this military zone.” Khamis is very clear about the core of her frustrations as she continues. “No, it’s not important those families that lived there. So they put this great huge wall between the neighbors, between the man and his garden, between the woman and her son.”

Also like Ageel and Mazali, Khamis is hyperaware of and disheartened by the military zone she describes. Taking her role seriously as the youth in the group, she reflects on the effects of these zones and military checkpoints on young Palestinians. She talks about what it is like as a student, describing the journey to school as the first challenge a student faces, and citing statistics to support her claims:
“We have to stop by the checkpoints that the Israeli military created to wait for hours and hours under the heat of the sun, or [in] the rain, so as…to go to our schools [and] universities. More than 225,000 students have to pass through the checkpoints before going to school, and more than 9,300 teachers have to pass through these checkpoints.”

Besides statistics, Khamis relied on photos at her RIC presentation to convey the facts. In the case of the checkpoints, she shows the picture of a group of terrified students and a teacher surrounded by the drawn guns of young, Israeli soldiers. “This is how they are faced,” she recounts, “by the Israeli soldier; how they are humiliated and horrified.” Turning to another photo, she shows how “they couldn’t go to their school, so they had to take the lesson on the ground of the checkpoint.”

Khamis also has photos and stories about women who have given birth at checkpoints, an offense a member of the RIC audience insists, must be a human rights abuse. Pointing to the sheer number of checkpoints in the West Bank alone—500 she cites—Khamis shares that she believes they can be for no other purpose but to “harass and humiliate” Palestinians. She also challenges the Israeli explanation of security, and touches on the disdain for the illegal Jewish settlers mentioned by both Ageel and Mazali:

“But if you want to protect your people, why do you put them inside the Palestinian areas, between me and my neighbor; between me and my school? Why do you put them between us? No, they are just to…make their [Palestinians] days and nights dark, and not only their nights.”
Discussing the Israeli policies of closure and curfews, she continues to spend a majority of the time talking about the numerous effects on youth. “More than two-thirds of Palestinian children are under the poverty line, which is two dollars a day. They are forced to work, to get some money to survive,” she explains, drawing on her work interviewing women and youth for a documentary project with TAM, an organization seeking to empower Palestinian women through media and training.

She has more accounts, related specifically to the implications of the Israeli army’s activities on growing up Palestinian. “They can’t sleep at night,” she shares, and “they can’t study” because of the Israeli airplanes flying and “bombarding” over their school. She also recounts her own, not-too-distant experience as a high school student studying to “the sound of bombarding,” knowing she remembers, “that they are bombarding my grandmother’s house.”

Particularly in her ability to talk about the experiences of youth, Khamis—like Ageel and Mazali—are afraid of the apathy in the U.S. and world community, but secure all the same in the significance of their stories and in their ability to talk to the American citizenry. After numerous accounts dripping with desperation, she looks concertedly at the audience and speaks articulately and faultlessly: “I decided to come to raise my voice and to tell the American people that you are part of this war; you are part of this conflict.”
Persistent about the point, she rephrases it many times, finally capturing it as “When you hear our…presentation, you become responsible because now you know the truth.”
A statement that may just echo in your ears as it has in mine.

On a pamphlet created by Partners for Peace assembled to provide a “Web Resources Guide,” the organizations of Rela Mazali and Ghada Ageel have been listed. Mazali’s New Profile is at www.newprofile.org, and Ageel’s Academy for Educational Development is at www.aed.org.
For more information about Partners for Peace, visit www.partnersforpeace.org, or call 202-863-2951. Or read Partnering for Peace in the Middle East Part I for a list of other organizations or ways to become involved.

Reza Corinne Clifton is a community organizer for high school reform at RI Children’s Crusade for Higher Education. She is also a freelance writer who is regularly published in several RI-area publications. Her articles can be seen at www.RezaRitesRi.com and she can be reached by emailing rezaclif@aol.com.

Thursday, 19 October 2006

'Jerusalem women,' touring as Partners for Peace, fault Israeli policies

HARVARD GAZETTE ARCHIVES

Ghada Ageel, a Palestinian Ph.D. student and Web diarist, listens to a question from the audience. (Staff photos Jon Chase/Harvard News Office)

'Jerusalem women,' touring as Partners for Peace, fault Israeli policies
By Ruth Walker Special to the Harvard News Office

"I am coming here to say, help us. America is involved in this conflict, and is feeding it. Wherever you stand, stand for justice."

That was the contention and the directive of Ghada Ageel, a third-generation Palestinian Muslim refugee, at the Harvard Divinity School Friday (Oct. 13).

She was there as part of "Jerusalem Women Speak," a three-woman panel on a tour of New England sponsored by the organization Partners for Peace, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit group. The Pluralism Project sponsored the University event.

Ageel (from left), Shireen Khamis, and Rela Mazali are touring New England together to present their views on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Ageel and her fellow-panelists - Shireen Khamis, a Palestinan Christian from Beit Jala, near Bethlehem, and Rela Mazali, a Jewish Israeli - are touring to speak from their own experience of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. All three women described themselves at one point or another in the session as relatively "privileged." But they said they saw American news organizations and the U.S. government as biased and unreceptive to reports of Palestinian suffering. This unanimity of views was typical of the session.

Ageel said that her family had been expelled from their homes in 1948 when the state of Israel was established. In May of that year, Israel was recognized as an independent state by the United Nations, an event that precipitated the invasion of the country by its Arab neighbors.
In 1995, during the hopeful moment of the Oslo peace process, Ageel went to Israel to study Hebrew and, for the first time, to meet Israelis and connect with them as human beings. "We could agree on many things," she said. But it was an eye-opener, she said, to see how different the standard of living for Israel was from that of the refugee camp where she had grown up.
Khamis, who said she was part of a Christian community that has been present in Israel since the very beginning of the Christian era, showed pictures of her family's olive trees, marked for destruction by red slashes of paint, and then uprooted by the Israelis, she said, to make way for a new security wall "to protect settlers from all over the world."

Mazali suggested that the stresses of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict were "brutalizing" Israeli society as well as Arabs.

Mazali also shared her experience of trying, and failing, to get into a mainstream Israeli newspaper a report of what she saw as a significant shift in Israeli tactics in what all three panelists called the "occupied territories": Instead of bulldozing the homes of militants - suspected or convicted, she said, the security forces had started destroying them with artillery shells.

She worked her contacts and pulled her strings, but the paper was not interested. It was considered a nonevent, Mazali said. In the paper's view, "It was a piece of reality that's been 'disappeared' from the reality that is passed on to you and to me, too."
Partners for Peace says that it works to bring to American audiences and media "the voices that often go unheard" as part of its advocacy for a "just and lasting settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict." This year's tour, running from Oct. 7 to 24, is the 12th the group has sponsored. The three women hadn't met until they came to the United States and are unlikely to be able to meet again once they return to the Middle East.

It was not exactly a feel-good session.

Mark Braverman, a member of the Partners for Peace board, who introduced the panel, observed, "Confronting this situation creates a crisis of faith. How does one maintain one's faith in the face of evil?"

Mazali thanked her audience simply for being present - "It's not easy to hear what we have to say."

It was also not a session that purported to give both the pros and the cons of the "occupation"; rather, it presented a case against Israeli activities from the perspective of three different communities. Some dissenting voices were raised, however.

An Israeli in the audience, who had spent three years on active duty in the Israeli Defense Forces and another nine years as a reservist, challenged the view of Israeli soldiers at the checkpoints as "inhumane."

Questions from the floor also included one from a Roman Catholic activist who criticized the three for not presenting a fuller picture of Israeli fears and concerns.

Palestinian refugees sit at Khan Younis refugee camp

Palestinian refugees sit at Khan Younis refugee camp